Skip Navigation
We use cookies to offer you a better browsing experience, provide ads, analyze site traffic, and personalize content. If you continue to use this site, you consent to our use of cookies.
NEA Legal & Employment Guidance

Educator Rights Speaking to the Press

Teachers and support staff have the right to speak to the press, but there are some limitations you should keep in mind.
A woman in a blue jacket in front of a camera Patrick G. Ryan
Alison Sylvester, a middle school social studies teacher in Springfield, VT
Published: April 4, 2023
This resource originally appeared on NEA.org

Speaking to the press and writing letters to the editor are classic protected First Amendment activities, provided you make clear you are not speaking on behalf of your employer and your speech does not “materially disrupt [] classwork” or involve “substantial disorder or invasion of the rights of others.” Tinker v. Des Moines Indep. Cmty. Sch. Dist., 393 U.S. 503, 513 (1969); Mahanoy Area Sch. Dist. v. B.L., -- U.S. --, 141 S. Ct. 2038, 2047-48 (2021). Go to reference

You should rarely, if ever, publicly speak critically about specific students. And as always, you should be respectful, even when being critical.

Even if speech is made off-campus, it can lose protection for foreseeably causing a material disruption at school where, for example, the speech threatens or harasses a student or educator publicly on social media. Kowalski v. Berkeley Cty. Schs,, 652 F.3d 565, 573-74 (4th Cir. 2011); Bell v. Itawamba Cty. Sch. Bd., 799 F.3d 379, 398-400 (5th Cir. 2015). Go to reference

Similarly, if your speech defamed someone it would no longer be protected by the First Amendment. If your protest activity is reported in the press, that activity generally is protected by the First Amendment. You could lose that protection if your protest activity results in “substantial disorder,” Tinker, 393 U.S. at 513. Go to reference as would be the case where a protest turns violent or involves participants breaking the law.

Tenure will also provide some measure of protection for such speech and activity, but tenure laws generally hold educators to higher standards than other members of the public.

Speech or activities that are out of step with community norms are generally not protected under tenure laws.

  • 1 Tinker v. Des Moines Indep. Cmty. Sch. Dist., 393 U.S. 503, 513 (1969); Mahanoy Area Sch. Dist. v. B.L., -- U.S. --, 141 S. Ct. 2038, 2047-48 (2021).
  • 2 Kowalski v. Berkeley Cty. Schs,, 652 F.3d 565, 573-74 (4th Cir. 2011); Bell v. Itawamba Cty. Sch. Bd., 799 F.3d 379, 398-400 (5th Cir. 2015).
  • 3 Tinker, 393 U.S. at 513.

This page is intended to provide general information. For specific advice, you should always contact your local union or attorney. 

Speak Up For Students and Public Schools

When we act together and lift our voices together in unison, we can improve the lives of children.
Broken pencils

Together, we will claim victories for public education

Join thousands of your fellow Oregon educators in contributing monthly to OEA-PAC and make your voice heard!
Logo

Keeping the Promise of Quality Public Education

The Oregon Education Association (OEA) is a union committed to the cause of providing the basic right of great public education to every student. OEA represents about 41,000 educators working in pre-kindergarten through grade 12 public schools and community colleges. OEA’s membership includes licensed teachers and specialists, classified/education support professionals (ESPs), community college faculty, retired educators, and student members. OEA members also belong to the 3.2 million members of the National Education Association (NEA).